We Tell Victims to Report Scams. But Who Is There When They Do? What was the romance scam fusion cell suggestion?

Every week in Australia, victims of romance scams reach out for help.

And too often, they hear a version of the same message:

“Unfortunately, there is little more we can do.”

In one recent case, a victim was told their money had been moved into cryptocurrency, likely overseas, and that the investigation could not progress further. Their report would be kept for intelligence purposes.

For victims, this moment is devastating. Not only because of the money they have lost.
But because it feels like the system has stepped back from them.

A National Strategy That Sees the Problem

The Australian Government is not unaware of the scale of this issue.

Romance scams caused more than $156 million in losses in 2024, and that figure is likely far higher due to underreporting.

The Romance Scam Fusion Cell brought together 21 organisations across law enforcement, banks, digital platforms and support services to tackle the problem.

The report shows real progress:

  • over 1,000 suspected scam transactions identified

  • hundreds of scam websites and profiles disrupted

  • improved intelligence sharing across sectors

This work matters.

It helps stop scams before money is lost.

But the report also reveals something deeper.

The Harm Is Fully Understood

The report makes it clear that romance scams are not just financial crimes.

Victims experience:

  • emotional trauma

  • isolation from family and friends

  • long-term psychological harm

  • grief comparable to losing a loved one

Scammers groom victims over months or years. They isolate them. They manipulate them. They dismantle their support networks. By the time the crime is exposed, many victims are left completely alone.

The system understands this. The fusion cell report documents it in detail.

And Yet, Support Remains the Missing Piece

Despite recognising the depth of harm, the system response after the crime is limited.

Victims are directed to:

  • online reporting platforms

  • referral pathways

  • fragmented support services

The report itself identifies major barriers:

  • victims feel shame and embarrassment, preventing help-seeking

  • support is fragmented and inconsistent

  • victims experience support fatigue, being redirected between services

And most critically:

The National Anti-Scam Centre is not funded to provide ongoing victim support services.

So the responsibility shifts. Not to a coordinated system. But to others.

The Reality on the Ground

Across Australia, victim support is already happening. But not where people might expect.

It is being delivered by:

  • victim advocates

  • small organisations

  • former police and specialists

  • community networks

Often seven days a week.

Often unfunded.

This work exists because victims need:

  • someone to listen

  • someone to explain what has happened

  • someone to help them disengage

  • someone to help them rebuild

Because when a victim reports a scam, what they receive is often not support. It is a process. A submission.
A reference number. And then silence.

A Digital Crime Met With a Digital Response

Romance scams occur in a highly sophisticated digital environment.

They involve:

  • encrypted messaging platforms

  • cryptocurrency transactions

  • international criminal networks

Yet when victims seek help, the response is often reduced to a digital reporting pathway. This disconnect matters. Because recovery is not a digital process. It is human.

The Solution Is Not Complicated

The Fusion Cell has already shown what works.

The peer-support trial demonstrated that victims who engaged in group support felt:

  • safer

  • less isolated

  • more empowered

  • more hopeful

But that program will not continue. Not because it failed. But because there is no funding to sustain it. This is the gap.

What Needs to Change

If Australia is serious about addressing scams, then victim support cannot remain an afterthought.

We need:

A funded, national, human-centred response that includes:

  • real people available at the point of reporting

  • trauma-informed support embedded into the system

  • coordinated pathways, not fragmented referrals

  • collaboration with external specialists who can assist

Because right now, victims are navigating one of the most complex and traumatic experiences of their lives with little structured support.

Final Thought

We have built systems to collect reports. We are improving systems to disrupt scams. But we have not yet built a system that truly supports victims after the crime. So when victims are told:

“There is little more we can do”

What they hear is something far more damaging. That they are now on their own. And that is the part of this problem we can fix. Now.

Next
Next

Cyber attack v scams: are we framing the threat the right way?